테크 재벌들은 트럼프에게 등을 돌릴까? (카라 스위셔 출연) | 데이비드 프럼 쇼
The Atlantic · 조회수 3.1만회
인기 댓글
2위@johnschira904110시간 전
Universal, "government" paid healthcare costs less per person than the US system. Anywhere from 20% to 40% less - easy to confirm this.번역 보기
👍 29 좋아요
댓글 0
· 로그인 없이 익명 동물 이름으로 참여합니다3위@mshaque21659시간 전
I have a major counterpoint to your argument Mr Frum. UnitedHealth Group had a net income of $12.06 billion on $447.6 billion in total revenue. So, what if this $12.6 B was actually put into healthcare rather than profit for shareholders, then Medicare for All makes sense. These obscene profits from denying healthcare is just morally repugnant.번역 보기
👍 15 좋아요
댓글 0
· 로그인 없이 익명 동물 이름으로 참여합니다관련 영상
궤도가 과학적으로 설계한 궁극의 오코노미야키
[현장영상] "과학수사대가 진입했습니다" 들이닥친 경찰,, 센터장의 '분노'
[속보] 소아응급실에 과학수사대가? 선넘은 경찰, 센터장의 작심발언 #아주대병원 #압수수색
물리학자들이 말하는 이 세상이 가짜일 수도 있다는 가능성 | 오늘과학 S2 ep.6
한때 효도 선물 1위였는데… 바디프랜드·세라젬·휴테크가 어려워진 이유
불교 경전을 외운 AI는 깨달음을 얻은 것일까? | 아는 것과 깨닫는 것이란
테크 기업 CEO가 처음으로 밝히는 외계인 조우 경험!
2028학년도 수능 대비 윤도영 통합과학 Curriculum
1위@kcull410시간 전(수정됨)
What frum misses in his analysis of US healthcare is how employers use healthcare as a cudgel to create job-lock, something he as an evangelist of free markets, should point out. I work in healthcare of all industries and I know dozens of people who stay in jobs that aren’t just terrible, but pay substantially less than others because the health insurance is so much better by the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. If you have a chronic disease and are stuck with an employer-based high-deductible plan, the results can be catastrophic. Whether the change away from employer-based healthcare is “incrementalist” or not, he and other conservatives need to understand how much of a blight it is on those who work jobs for a living. Always remember a fundamental project of conservatives before and after trump is to take healthcare away from people who need it and can’t afford it.번역 보기
👍 44 좋아요
댓글 0
· 로그인 없이 익명 동물 이름으로 참여합니다