Andy Burnham can’t explain the economy | UK Politics | The New Statesman
The New Statesman · 39K views
인기 댓글
2위@MrTomwazere13 hours ago
These two are so good. Love this show번역 보기
👍 14 좋아요
댓글 0
· 로그인 없이 익명 동물 이름으로 참여합니다3위@richierich76091 day ago
If I hated the pension altogether and wanted to eliminate it, the first thing I'd do is convert it in to a 'welfare' program only going to people who 'need' it. Then I could start demagoguing the whole thing saying "You're paying for these benefits, but this program isn't for you." That works very effectively in the US, creating a universal resentment of anyone poorer than oneself, and it empowers politicians, when the overton window comes in just right, to start wiping things out. I understand the liberal sentiment to pay benefits only to the needy. That way lies hell.번역 보기
👍 14 좋아요
댓글 0
· 로그인 없이 익명 동물 이름으로 참여합니다관련 영상
How Your Personality Influences Your Politics
1 Gen Z Democrat vs 20 Boomers (ft. Rep. Maxwell Frost) | Surrounded
How British Politics Became So Corrupt
Is Jon Ossoff the key for Democrats in 2028? | Politics Weekly America
The Leftist Manosphere and Identity Politics
Canadian politics UPDATE! Carney can't stop WINNING??
Ulrich Siegmund: Is this AfD politician the most dangerous man in Germany?
POLITICAL SHOCK: Unions BREAK with Democrats in data center REVOLT
1위@rflameng22 hours ago
The big issue with borrowing is not the 'principle' of borrowing, nor is it the interest that must be paid, it is that the borrowed money isn't USED for the right things. When a government borrows money, that money should go towards longterm investment with a very significant return. It can't be spent of funding running expenses or on 'comfort' things.번역 보기
👍 23 좋아요
댓글 0
· 로그인 없이 익명 동물 이름으로 참여합니다